Jump to content

Talk:Jac Naylor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible sources

[edit]
  • "BBC - Holby City - Characters - Jac Naylor". bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-03-10.
  • "BBC - Holby City - Cast - Rosie Marcel". bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-03-10.
  • "HolbyBlue is Back!". Holby Gazette. 11 March 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-01.
  • "Jac in Holby spin-off". bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-03-10.
  • "Rosie Marcel joins Holby". Holby Gazette. 12 September 2005. Retrieved 2008-03-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • "Nick Back in Holby". Holby Gazette. 15 February 2006. Retrieved 2008-03-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • "Children in Need". Holby Gazette. 7 November 2006. Retrieved 2008-03-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • "Affairs of the Heart". Holby Gazette. 23 May 2007. Retrieved 2008-03-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • "Luke Roberts Interview". Holby Gazette. 1 February 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • "holby.tv awards 2007". Holby Gazette. Retrieved 2008-03-10.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Frickative (talk • contribs) 23:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just dumping some more sources here as I find them. Soaper1234 - talk 09:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jac Naylor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline section

[edit]

@JuneGloom07:@Soaper1234: - Hello. I wanted to know your thoughts on the storyline section. I blame it for putting me off trying to improve this article. What are your thoughts on losing the section? Would you be interested in working together on the article?Rain the 1 21:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If the events in the section can be covered by sourced development info, then I reckon it could go. I'd definitely like to contribute something to its improvement too. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Raintheone: If it can be covered by development then sure, get rid. I tried to tidy up and add bits to the development recently, so I'd definitely be up for helping with the article's recovery. Soaper1234 - talk 07:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is great. If we choose different parts of her duration to cover then we could get some definite improvement. I have a good selection of mags from her first four years that could be useful. Maybe if you would like to pick sections about Johnny, Fletch, Matteo, Jasmine, Gaskell etc?Rain the 1 17:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Great plan. I've already started a section on Fletch, so I'd quite like to finish that. From there, I'm happy to help however - just let me know. Soaper1234 - talk 18:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is great. I have managed to find a couple of good articles in old Inside Soaps so I will start adding info.Rain the 1 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just an update that I have finished adding what I found in pre-2011 mags.Rain the 1 12:09, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's looking really good so far! I'll try and add more too. Soaper1234 - talk 19:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'd like to take on the Jonny/Emma section and maybe Jasmine. I'll start gathering sources. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Soaper1234: It is looking better already. @JuneGloom07: I thought they would be a good choice for you since you created Jonny and Jasmine's articles.Rain the 1 06:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What shall we do with the storyline section?Rain the 1 20:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to scrap the storylines section since most of it was from early in the stint and that is (mostly) covered now. I do have plans to continue with this, but my other things are taking over at the moment! Soaper1234 - talk 16:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think we need to make a note of which storylines aren't covered by sourced content before removing them. I know I have to finish the Emma stuff, and add a section on Jasmine. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is okay as we can wait. I did think it needed more information on Joseph but I couldn't find much content for it.Rain the 1 10:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There might be more when he returns later this year. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You were correct - already more information in her latest Inside Soap interview.Rain the 1 20:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since the last time we visited this issue.. Soaper has expanded the mental health section fully and I have since covered the brain tumour and death story. Maybe it is the correct time to remove the plot section since it will not detract from the article. Anything further, from Jasmines to the shooting & John Gaskell's operation stories can be added in the future?Rain the 1 22:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the removal of the storyline section. There's more than enough sourced information now and more to be added, so the section is almost redundant. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would also support the section being removed. Soaper1234 - talk 19:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great, I am glad we finally got there. I have now removed them and it was a total length of 24,443! Woah..Rain the 1 18:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jac_Naylor&oldid=1206871608"