Talk:Jaan Kaplinski

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Estonia High‑importance

Jaan Kaplinski is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Sockpuppet edit war

user:Aleksa Lukic user:Sander Säde user:Anna Frodesiak and whatever other sockpuppets you use - I make each of my edits separate so they can be un-done by themselves. There's no need to undo all of them! Change the ones you feel do not improve the article and EXPLAIN THE CHANGES. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 14:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop accusing others of sockpuppetry and be civil - obviously various users disagree with your changes. Also, explain your edits, as you haven't sourced even a single one of them. Use edit summary to explain why you did the changes and why do you think they are needed. --Sander Säde 14:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information needs to be sourced when it is newly added to an article. Not when you are changing or removing thigs. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS - Nice move on removing my comment on your talk page. I suppose I'm not the first person to have accused you of inappropriate behavior seeing as you don't want others to read it on your talk page. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) And when you remove details from an article without any explanation it is considered to be vandalism. I will revert your edits once more and clean up the article a bit. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia, I recommend you radically change your attitude - and remember that banned users should not edit even anonymously. --Sander Säde 15:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unsourced content from an article about a living person is in line with Wikipedia policy. Thank you for accusing me of being a previously banned user. The behavior of Wikipedia "regulars" like you is exactly why I have absolutely no desire to ever obtain a Wikipedia account. 24.202.35.184 (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From your behavior and attitude here, I think that is a win-win situation. --Sander Säde 15:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unsourced negative content from BLPs is what you are referring to, I'm afraid. And given that you made a ridiculous accusation of sockpuppetry and treated users with whom you disagreed with sarcasm and incivility, you've made it hard for others to communicate civilly with you. But that goes for Sander too: don't raise your temper like that in an issue like this. Biting comments and one-liners belong somewhere else. ALI ^{nom nom} 15:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]