Jump to content

Talk:JVC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Section 1.3

[edit]

"Present" doesn't seem very NPOV to me.

Is it better now, I removed the POV from that section that I could see. — Wackymacs 18:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'The Equivalent Of'

[edit]

This is highly dangerous - citing prices in what one perceives as current rates (including inflation). This is not a good idea. Best to keep to the actual prices and let readers adjust themselves. Otherwise you have to go back constantly in thousands of articles and keep redacting. How much has this dollar tanked in the past year? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.193.255.35 (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:Victor-Entertainment-logo.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find any specifics on JVC products on Wikipedia

[edit]

JVC is a big company with lots of products, wondering why isn't there self interest on JVC products from cameras, camcorders, stereos, TVs and more. There should be more on their products on individual articles.--Oxforduniversity1 (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia's policy on notability. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and most emphatically is not a product catalog. We cover individual products where they are particularly innovative, influential, or otherwise significant in some way. For example, we have an article on the Sony CDP-101, the first CD player commercially sold, and we have one on the first VHS machine, the JVC HR-3300. But this is not justification for having articles on the bazillions of CD player and VCR models that followed them. As it is, I think there are too many articles on specific products that have slipped through the cracks. Jeh (talk) 20:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You can add the list of models but not entirely everything on every model. JVC has unique models such as old school boom boxes, camera's and etc but not to list everything but things of the list they made but if there is a specific source on a particular model that may have had something different but like another model, might be a good explain that specific thing. If one had 40 watts and the other had 47 watts but they look alight, there should be some clarification on that is what I am mentioning.--Oxforduniversity1 (talk) 08:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, we don't need yet another "list of Xyz products" article. In fact, a number of us are trying to get many of the existing articles of that sort deleted. Wikipedia is not a product guide. Slight differences between otherwise similar products that had no particular significance outside JVC's product line are exactly what Wikipedia is not for. Try audiogon.com or AVS forums. Jeh (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on JVC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on JVC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct When?

[edit]

The first sentence refers to the company in past tense and the info box says JVC is defunct as of October 1, 2011. The body of the article seems to contradict this. It does state that it merged with Kenwood and the Kenwood article indicates the merger took place on October 1, 2008. Should that, then, be the date in the infobox? If so, shouldn't all of the information about branding changes in 2008 be removed from this article? That would surely belong in the article about JV CKenwood, not this article if this article is about a company that was defunct in 2008. Can someone clarify whether the company was defunct in 2011, as indicated in the infobox, or at the time of the merger in 2008, in which case post-2008 information would not belong here? LordApofisu (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"JVC GZ-HD7" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect JVC GZ-HD7 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 21 § JVC GZ-HD7 until a consensus is reached. NotCory (talk) 11:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:JVC&oldid=1207883817"