Talk:J. Cleaveland Cady

Spelling of Cleaveland

His middle name is spelled without one "A" (Cleveland), according to New International Encyclopedia. Superslum 01:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

How do they spell Moses Cleaveland, for whom Cleveland [sic] Ohio is named? --Wetman 02:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Moses Cleaveland (1754-1806) is the entry. "The form of the name was altered in 1831, to Cleveland by the editor of the Cleveland Advertiser, who wished to economize space for a headline."

Another man named Parker Cleaveland (1780-1858) is an entry. "Father of American Mineralogy" was his title. His publication named Mineralogy and Geology appeared in 1816 (third edition, 1856). Superslum 19:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Google has almost as many one way as the other, but Time and the New York Times both go with Cleaveland. -- Mwanner | Talk

Birth and death records, college records also spell is Cleaveland Rublamb (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:J. Cleaveland Cady/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 17:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article using the table below. Comments will follow shortly. Please let me know if you have any questions at any time! Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 17:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Rublamb, I've spent some time starting a source spot-check and a reliability check. This is a really interesting article, so thank you for all your work on it. I wonder if you'd like to take a look at my comments so far before I go any further with the review? Conscious there are a lot of sources and citations and I want to make sure you agree with my suggestions. Let me know what you think! Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 20:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

@Unexpectedlydian: I don't have a problem working through your comments and making corrections. (I will get started shortly). This was one of my early articles and probably can use some cleanup; I appreciate your time on this. I suspect I might have been more flexible on some online sources back then, and will gladly take a look. I know that Daytonian in Manhattan consists of academic-quality articles with citations so that we don't have to worry about it. Sorry that some citation links are dead; all were fine back when I posted it for GA review but that was months ago. I will go through and fix any others that I find. In general, I don't see an issue with using an article on a church's website as a source for basic facts on a church building. One way to look at it is that the church's website is secondary as it is not by Cady or anyone involved in the church's construction. Also, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and [WP:PRIMARYCARE]] indicate that sources such as these may be the best source for specific facts. That being said, I will see if there is something else out there. Almost all of his projects were written up in professional magazines. These journals are mostly digitized but not indexed, so it is time-consuming to go through each issue but it is doable. Newspapers.com and the NY Times may be another option. I will get to it! Again, thanks for taking this on. Rublamb (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for this, very happy to go consider the sources within this context. Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 20:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

@Unexpectedlydian: I have addressed all of your comments. In addition, I went through the sources and replaced others that were similiar to the ones you mentioned. The article should be better now, ready for the rest of the GA review process. Many thanks. Rublamb (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

@Rublamb Brilliant, thanks so much for your prompt reply. I will continue with the review now :) Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 20:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

@Rublamb Thanks for bearing with me as I finished the review. Initial review is now complete. Hopefully my suggestions are self-explanatory. Do let me know if you have any questions! Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 15:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

@Unexpectedlydian: I believe I have addressed everything. Let me know if you see anything else. Thanks so much for your detailed review. Very helpful. Rublamb (talk) 00:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Rublamb Thank you for addressing everything, I appreciate the work which has gone into this article! Happy to promote this to GA now, well done :) Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 10:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I've made a few minor edits throughout to fix typos, remove some ambiguity, and to adjust formatting. Lead Y Early life Y Career Y Projects Please can you attribute the following quotes:  Done The latter made the designer "a true architectural pioneer."  Done making this "an early and excellent example of a multi-use project."  Done It "has been hailed as one of the finest examples of Romanesque Revival architecture in New York City."  Done At the time, this "fortress-like mansion" was quite different from the Queen Anne style that was popular in New Haven.  Done The quotation from George Brush about North Sheffield is a bit out of proportion compared to the rest of the subsection (i.e. it is a large quotation about only one of the many buildings). Is it necessary to include? Comment: Good question. I realized that an overview of the styles that Cady used at Yale was needed, not just a list and a description of one building. Sources were slim on the demolished buildings, but I added some descriptions and split the long list of buildings, which should read better. I left the quote, shortened a bit, with a new intro that explains that this description applies to three buildings (one that survives). I can trim the quote some more, if you think that is needed but think it makes sense now. Professional affiliations Y Honours Y Personal Y
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead sections  Done I don't think you need to state "or J. Cleaveland Cady" in the lead. See MOS:FULLNAME.  Done "Rundbogenstil style" is mentioned in the lead but never again in the article - I suggest removing.  Done More than fifteen of Cady's buildings are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Only 12 NRHPs are listed in the table in the article. Is there another source stating that there are over fifteen? If not, I'd suggest changing the detail in the lead.  Done In 1920, Alexander Dana Noyes wrote, "In his professional career, J. Cleveland Cady was perhaps the embodiment of the effort of American architecture, fifty years ago, to find itself while cutting loose from the false and meretricious standards of the Second Empire." The lead should only contain info included in the rest of the article, so this standalone quotation feels out of place. It would sit far better within the article body.  Done His best-known surviving design is the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, although his contemporaries knew him for the Metropolitan Opera House and fifteen buildings at Yale University, now demolished. Is there anything which can back up the statement that the American Museum of Natural History is the "best-known" surviving design? Or the statement that he was more famous during his lifetime for other things? Comment: There was at one point, but this must have been cut. I reworded it to solve the issue. Layout  Done I don't think a 'Professional affiliations' section is needed, as it only mentioned one professional affiliation. Could you move the paragraphs into the 'Career' section instead?  Done Similarly 'Honours' could be a subheading of 'Career', as it is quite a short section by itself.  Done 'Personal' is usually called 'Personal life'. Words to watch None idenitifed. Fiction Y List incorporation  Done The list in the Honours section could probably work as prose, but I don't think it's an issue if it stays as a list.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Sources of information are cited in the appropriate places.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Source spot-check The New York Times. 1919-04-18  Done Cady and Gregory formed a partnership known as Cady & Gregory in 1909. I can't find this in the source. You may want to cite Curran, Kathleen (1993) p.4 instead. Comment: Good catch. Obviously, there was another source at some point.  Done In 1881, he married Emma Matilda Bulkley of Orange, New Jersey. I know there's only so many ways of saying this fact, but this sentence is exactly the same as that in the source, so I'd suggest changing. Curran, Kathleen (1993).  Done Between 1857 and 1864, Cady pursued his studies in architecture with an unknown German professor of architecture who was living in New York City. I don't think the source explicitly states that the professor lived in NYC, only that Cady probably studied in NYC, and that separately he was tutored by a German professor. It could be that the professor was no tin NYC.  Done With formal training in Germany, Berg was the structural and mechanical engineer for the firm.  Done The source states that Berg also had training in Prussia and Switzerland.  Done The source states that Berg was probably the structural and mechanical engineer - it is not certain, so I'd suggest changing the article to change this.  Done In 1869, Cady received his big break with the commission to build the Brooklyn Art Association's Brooklyn Academy of Design. The reference to "big break" is a bit peacock-y and too close to what is in the source, so I'd suggest changing this sentence. Strikethrough Done inexpensive construction costs, functionality, and fireproofing. This is being very picky, but I can't help but think this is paraphrasing the source too closely. For the avoidance of doubt, I'd suggest changing.  Done Cady's design departed "from the traditional 'tomb-like' structures of fraternities at other schools." Instead, his Romanesque fraternity house "was more a cross between a house and fortress." it is Cady's "most overtly Richardsonian building." This became "one of the most successful and well-publicized public baths in nineteenth-century America." Can you attribute these quotes to Curran?  Done In 1883, Cady designed the Morgan Hall dormitory for Williams Collage. This was followed by a Lasell Gymnasium in 1886. Both buildings are a mix of Romanesque and Dutch styles and were executed in Kentucky and Williamstown limestone. I think these are meant to be p.37. Comment: Thanks for finding this error. I added the page numbers later, for the GA review, and obviously did not get them all right.  Done it was to include eighty showers. I can't find this on p.40. Comment: Source said eighty baths, most with rain showers. I correct the text. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. 1988.  Done Although this is not the style Cady is known for, architect Montgomery Schuyler said the Brooklyn Academy of Design is "one of the few successful secular Gothic designs." This is not a direct quote, so I'd rephrase and get rid of the quotation marks. Comment: I tracked down the original source of the quote Brief Biographies of American Architects Who Died Between 1897 and 1947.  Done In 1871 Milton See (1854–1920) joined his practice, followed by Louis DeCoppet Berg (1856–1945) in 1873. I can see this info on p.20. Harkrader, Nina E. (2021-07-01).  DoneCady was the architect of the original Metropolitan Opera House which opened in October 1883. I don't think the newspaper source states an opening date, and SAH Archipedia states it was completed in 1884. Comment: I found and restored the correct source. Also, newspaper articles confirm the fall 1883 opening season.  Done Designed by Cady, the Romanesque style Othniel C. Marsh House was built from 1875 to 1880 in New Haven. SAH Archipedia states it was opened in 1881. Comment: The other source mentions different completion dates for the interior and exterior. Since they both mention 1881, I am fine switching to that.  Done Marsh bequeathed the house to Yale University in 1899. This is almost exactly the same as the source, so I'd suggest changing. Continuing spot-check "J. Cleaveland Cady, Architect". Hartford Courant (Hartford, Connecticut). Y Korom J. JJ.  Done The latter made the designer "a true architectural pioneer." Can you attribute this to Korom?  Done ..making this "an early and excellent example of a multi-use project." Same here.  Done However, in 1936, it was noted, "The opera house was designed by J. C. Cady... Could you attribute this quotation? There is a footnote in the source which should say. Comment: Because Korom's citation was unclear, I ended up tracking down the original source for the quote. Thanks for encouraging me to explore this. Garbe, Patricia (February 1984).  Done In 1866, Cady designed the Nordhoff estate for Mr. and Mrs. Charles Nordhoff in Alpine, New Jersey. The source states that he visited Alpine in 1865 and designed the estate - there doesn't seem to be a mention of 1866? Chicago Tribune. January 19, 1878. Y "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places.  Done This source is repeated twice. The URL takes you to the search page. I'm guessing these citations are meant to link to the relevant entry? Comment: National Register citations are an ongoing battle across Wikipedia. Firstly, the NRHP keeps changing its website page names. Secondly, bots and editor's cleanup tools keep removing the specific search part of the citation, making the link redirect to the generic search page. I fixed the links and updated the citations to be different and to reflect the current name of the NRHP database website. "Plate No. VIII". The New York Sketch-Book of Architecture.  Done As far as I can see, the source (pages 99 or 107) does not describe the building as "highly-ornate" - is this inferred from the image? If so I'd remove from the article as that's an opinion.  Done Similarly, is The client's name and the building location is unknown. just inferred from the fact that there are none listed in the source? If so, I'd remove from the article as that's teetering on an assumption. J. Cleveland Cady". New York Herald. Y "Boone Tavern Hotel". National Register of Historic Places.  Done I can't see a mention of Berea College in this source? Comment: It throughout the document. I added the specific quote from unnumbered p. 7 to the citation. "The Brooklyn Academy of Design". The American Architect and Building News.  Done The citation should state pp.35 and 40 (not 37). "First Presbyterian Church of Oyster Bay". National Register of Historic Places. Y Plantsville Historic District National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. Y History of the First Presbyterian Church of Ithaca, New York, During One Hundred Years. Y Sullebarger, Beth; Arms, Meredith (November 1987). Y I've checked over 20% of sources including those which I have access to with the most citations, so I'm content to stop here. Source reliability spot-check "Yale's Lost Landmarks". Yale Alumni Magazine. Is this an official Yale publication?  Done Comment: It is the official publication of the Yale Alumni Association. The landing page for the start of the article is here "Ladies' Hall / Fairchild Hall, Berea College, Chestnut and South Main Street, Berea, Kentucky". Placeography.  Done What makes this a reliable source? I had to access via the Wayback machine (link broken) but it looks like a Wiki. Comment: I have updated the citation to include the new link and its publisher, the Minnesota Historical Society. Unfortunately, Wayback did not capture the source page that goes with this article but the link to it remains as an indication that this was a credible resource with references. "Boone Tavern History & Features". Historic Boone Tavern Hotel & Restaurant.  Done I had to access via the Wayback machine (link broken again). What makes this a reliable source? Generally I'd be hesitant to use historical information provided by an institution about itself - if there is a secondary source external to the Hotel (e.g. a book or news article) I'd much rather that was used. Wessels, William. Trailmarker  Done Can I check what makes this a reliable source? It appears to be a self-published blog (not sure how to determine whether the author is an authority on the subject). Also the name of the website is not Trailmarker. Comment: Trailmaker was the magazine that originally published this article in 1962. The article is republished on the Church of the Good Shepherd's website. I have updated the citation to indicate this. Its author was one of two founders of the Adirondack Museum, president of the Adirondack Historical Association, and senior warden of one of the churches covered in the article. Note that the only time this citation is use, it is now paied with another source. "First Presbyterian Church". Pocket Sights.  Done What makes this a reliable source? I'm unclear exactly what the website is and whether to trust the validity of info.  Done Comment: I replaced the source "J. Cleveland Cady". Landmark Hunter.  Done I can't access this source unfortunately. What makes this a reliable source? Comment: I replace this source with the NRHP nomination form. "Church of Good Shepherd: History". St. Huberts Isle.  Done Similar to above, ideally I wouldn't want to cite historical info about a place from a publication by the place itself (if that makes sense). If there's an alternate source that would be great. "The Church of the Good Shepherd -- No. 152 West 66th Street". Daytonian in Manhattan.  Done This appears to be a blog, so not ideal for reliability. "Sheffield Scientific School, New Haven, Connecticut". Lost New England.  Done Same as above. Just as a general observation, could the selected projects which are only backed up by a potential unreliable citation (see above), and do not have a NRHP, NRHD or LHD status, be removed from the selected projects list? Comment: Of course. At this point, I have gone through and replaced all such sources.
	2c. it contains no original research.	From conducting source spot-checks, I am content there has been no OR.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	A few instances of possible close paraphrasing have been addressed. From source spot-checks, I am content there has been no copyvio. Copyvio detector brings up nothing of concern.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The article contains information of Cady's businesses and career, his associates, personal life, and his involvement with architectural projects.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Article stays focussed on topic. There is a lot of architectural detail, but focussed on Cady's involvement.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	The content of the article is presented neutrally.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No evidence of instability or edit warring. A lot of recent edits are by nominator.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are tagged with copyright status.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are relevant (either of the subject or of buildings discussed) and have captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.