Jump to content

Talk:Jérôme d'Ambrosio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Picture in infobox

[edit]

That image was 2 years ago and it is the picture that he was raced in GP2. --Phanuruch8555 (talk) 04:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And? It's a decent photo, and better than the other one posted. You're not really the best person to be dealing with photos, given your edit-warring over the Vettel photo. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is a discussion going on here, do not just keep reverting to your preferred photo. The older photo is clearly a better photo, and the new one is only a side angle. A two-year old photo is fine, there is no requirement anywhere to have the newest photo regardless of quality. D'Ambrosio looks exactly the same now as he did two years ago, so there's no issue here. I've added the other photo further down in the article, but it's not a good enough photo to be in the infobox. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He drove on Friday at Japan 2010?

[edit]

On the ' Formula One ' section, it says that he did not drove at Japan as planned , but on his F1 results, it shows that he drove at Japan. Any explanations?--JerichoNation (talk) 04:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only thing I can think of is someone anticipated him driving then and went ahead and added the result in before the practice session. BosleyTree (talk) 11:27, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the statement that he didn't drive in Japan - 2010 Japanese Grand Prix specifically mentions that he did drive there, and both articles contain a photo of him doing it. DH85868993 (talk) 14:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Jérôme d'Ambrosio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]