Talk:Izumo-class cruiser
Izumo-class cruiser has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 23, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Izumo-class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 23:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Will start on this shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Toolbox check -- no dab or EL issues.
Structure/prose/detail -- let me know if any probs with my copyediting; other points:
- "Iwate served as the flagship for the divisional commander, Rear Admiral Misu Sotarō, and Izumo for the fleet commander, Vice Admiral Kamimura Hikonojō" -- This seems to imply that Izumo was also a flagship, is that what's meant? If so I'd be explicit about it, if not I'd rephrase to say exactly what her relationship was to Hikonojō.
- "Kamimura left Rurik to the tender administrations of his reinforcements" -- This almost sounds like "to the tender mercies", or do we in fact mean "administration by ships' tender(s)"?
Referencing -- couple of tweaks but basically formatting/reliability seems fine
Images -- US PD tag for File:Asama class 8 inch gun turret right elevation.jpg?
Summary -- just those three things above. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Tks, look good, passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Izumo-class cruiser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/Review/2000/winter/art3-w00.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages