Talk:Italo-Byzantine
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Italo-Byzantine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by TJMSmith (talk) 02:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Vasari disliked the "clumsy Greek style" of Italo-Byzantine painting (example pictured) that preceded the Renaissance? Omissi, Adrastos, "Byzantium and Italian Renaissance Art": "Giorgio Vasari, the Italian painter turned historian, whose 1550 Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects, from Cimabue to Our Times essentially defined the renaissance – the rinascita – as a rejection of ‘that clumsy Greek style’ (quella greca goffa maniera) and the creation of a new naturalism that captured the human form in ways not known before"; see also Voulgaropoulou, Margarita, "From Domestic Devotions to the Church Altar: Venerating Icons in the Late Medieval and Early Modern Adriatic", in Ryan, Salvador (ed), Domestic Devotions in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, 2020, MDPI Books, (reprint from Religions in 2019), online top of p. 203.
Created by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 03:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC).
- Article: Created on February 28. The prose is more than long enough, and the article well sourced. I don't see policy issues.
- Hook: Long enough, the content is properly sourced and interesting (I did learn something new and more than relevant out of reading it myself!).
- Other: QPQ checks. License for the image obviously checks (we are discussing a painting of the 1200s here)
- The hook passes. On a side comment, a nicely written article and very informative.--GDuwenHoller! 19:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)