Talk:Italian ironclad San Martino
Italian ironclad San Martino has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 8, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photo
[edit]here. Parsecboy (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Another here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad San Martino/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 04:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria
[edit]With a few minor grammatical tweaks, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar as well as structural layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
The article has a decent handful of reliable sources, which it makes good use of. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic in sufficient detail. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article maintains a neutral tone throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
In the five months since its creation, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
All three images currently used in this article are public domain, so there is no fair-use-related concern. All serve relevant illustrative purposes in this instance. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
The article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 00:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Italian military history articles
- Italian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages