Talk:Issaquah Highlands

Issaquah Highlands has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 11, 2018. (Reviewed version).

United States: Washington / Seattle / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

I am the author of this article. It was compiled from various sources, including, a "case study" for the Urban Land Institute (ULI) which I edited prior to submission and information made available to me by home builders, the development company and the local chapter of the Building Industry Association in my capacity as a freelance writer. Every attempt was made to keep the information in lines with a neutral point of view. The subject, on my opinion, is significant as it represents a large scale mixed use master plan developed under principles of New Urbanism and Traditional Neighborhood design. CaptBainbridge (talk) 20:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Issaquah Highlands/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 09:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one as well. Will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 09:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

Lead

Needs United States worked into the location for readers unfamiliar with area.
- Fixed.

History

King County could be linked in the first paragraph here.
- Fixed.
"The first homes at Issaquah Highland", > Issaquah Highlands (last paragraph).
- Fixed.

Transportation

"operate bus service to Issaquah Highlands", might be an American/English difference but, this reads a little oddly to me. Should it be "operate a bus service" or services?
- Wasn't a ENGVAR difference, just a typo on my part. Fixed.

Very little I can find to bring up really. References are well formatted and of no concern. A well written piece. Placed on hold until the points above are addressed. Kosack (talk) 11:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: Thanks for this review as well. All addressed as written above. Sounder Bruce 17:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: All issues addressed, I have no further concerns. A thorough and detailed article which easily meets the GA criteria. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.