Talk:Iris atrofusca
 | A fact from Iris atrofusca appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Taxonomy
[edit]The 'taxonomy' section looks like a collection of random disjointed facts with some connection to a name. Does anyone know enough to turn this into a proper paragraph or two? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Citation overkill
[edit]The citation overkill makes this article difficult to read. If three references verify the same content, then only one need be cited. If citations can be pruned and/or relocated to enhance readability while still maintaining verifiability, every effort should be made to do so. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)