Talk:Investigation of a Flame

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Investigation of a Flame article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Documentary / War / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wikiproject Film

Previous proposal for deletion

This page was proposed for deletion by Cawhee (talk · contribs) on 7 January 2013 with the comment:
It has been six years since the article's submission and did not meet wikistandards at creation. In 2009 the article received an inline citations tag that has been ignored. A large number of the reference links are dead and because the references do not use in-line citations it is impossible to see whether they were of importance to the article or not.
It was contested by Arxiloxos (talk · contribs) on 04:24, 7 January 2013 with the comment:
GNews shows multiple reviews, has won awards, not suitable for PROD.

Discussion

I would like to thank Arxiloxos for fixing the problems I highlighted. I would ask if this article was worth saving, however apparently to users such as Arxiloxos, it is. Thank you so much for taking the time out of your day to generate in-line citations and congratulations on saving an article from proposed deletiion that I see you care for. Seeing that much more work has gone into the article, I expect more bold edits going into this article in the future. I will note that I am keeping an eye on this article and will ensure that it receives the attention it apparently deserves.
Best regards, --Cawhee (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]