Talk:Invasion of France (1795)

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

French version of the article

I just noticed that the French version of this article has amazing quantity of content and quality. A good way of expanding would be translating from it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.66.196.163 (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The correct term for this episode is either The Battle of Quiberon 1795 or The Quiberon Expedition

British historians don't call this episode the "Invasion of France". It is known as the Battle of Quiberon 1795 or the Quiberon Expedition. It is strange to use this term in English and slightly inaccurate. It wasn't an invasion as it was led by French emigres. Can one invade ones own country? It is strange and unhistorical to call this episode an invasion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbo2014 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Invasion of France (1795). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Order of battle in the Invasion of France (1795) into Invasion of France (1795)

Per WP:NOPAGE, this list needs more context to be encyclopedic, and I don't see a good reason to have this forked from the main page. There's currently no navigational value to this list. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NO MERGE. I agree with Voorts, that this list has no context, and would contribute nothing to the understanding of the "Invasion of France". I would also suggest that an old request to change the title of this article be reconsidered. "Quiberon" should be somewhere in the title. Vicedomino (talk) 09:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]