Talk:Inuit grammar

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Inuktitut language#Objects|table for ''non-specific verbs'']]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Just a question... in the section about the tense modifiers, the suffix -laaq- is said to delete a previous consonant, but the example that's given "uqaqlaaqtara" still has the consonant that was to be deleted. Shouldn't it be "uqalaaqtara", without the second Q? TarisWerewolf 01:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment salvaged from article

[1] - ∅ (∅), 05:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have concerns about some of this data. Of course, all sentences need to be checked with a native speaker, or the source needs to be cited. I thought ilisaijuq meant "one who is studying". It certainly doesn't have habitual aspect. I thought student was ilisaiji in that dialect. You have an example where mik is attached to inuktitut. Is this possible?

Please try to get all sentences checked by a speaker, if they haven't been already, or switch to published examples.

Very good work on explaining a range of phenomena though! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.94.123 (talk)

Specific grammatical suffixes

The article says 'take suffixes that indicate the grammatical person of both the subject and the object, but not their grammatical number.' but I don't think that's true...Mallon's Reference Grammar refers to (without enumerating) 'the various combinations of duals and plurals' in the relevant sections, and Spalding's learning Inuktitut shows separate forms for singular subject (-vara, -vat, -vaa) and plural subject (-vavut, -vasi, -vaat), and a similar distinction for singular and plural objects, and the Inuktitut Morphological Analyser (example: takuvaka) seems to bear this out. Does anyone know for sure, or better yet, have a full chart of all the possible forms? Moszczynski 05:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dialects

It will be useful if the author specifies the dialect of each example —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glammy (talk • contribs) 05:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polysynthetic?

What exactly makes it a polysynthetic language? I mean, why is tusaatsiarunnanngittualuujunga considered to be one word and not six words? (tusaa tsiaq junaq nngit tualuu junga)--90.179.235.249 (talk) 15:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, because you can't say the pieces individually, as you could if they were independent words. You might have 'fish' or 'kayaq' or 'night' in the word, but it wouldn't be the same an the independent word for that thing.

Second, if you make a mistake, you have to start over from the beginning. You can't screw up the junaq and correct just that; you have to go back to tusaa. — kwami (talk) 15:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not universal approach

This article should be converted to normal ergative–absolutive terminology. The odd terms used in only this article, as a doomed attempt to recast the grammar as nominative–accusative, are opaque to everyone else. — kwami (talk) 15:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nouns

Where are they?! This is a huge, gaping hole in this article! 72.21.131.202 (talk) 00:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Inuit grammar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]