Talk:Innovators Under 35

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Innovators Under 35 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improving

I have spent a lot of time on the article, but I think it can still be improved a lot. It would be nice to have more information on each of the winners in the article. Rrrlf (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that including the complete lists of winners is way too much detail. In some years, they listed 100 people! Currently, it's "just" 35, meaning that the size of this list will explode soon. We list winners of more selective awards, but for awards like this, we don't list all, just link to the place where the magazine itself lists them. There's n o need to replicate all that. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]