Talk:Injustice

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Keep.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmonteiro15.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Further Development

It's quite amusing how the reference to Plato's "What Justice is Not" points straight to the article of "Justice". Whoever did that needs to be writing more articles.
I would really like to see some development here though, we could use a lot more references and perhaps even some examples of injustice. JulianParge (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion for development of this stub

If this article is developed, I would suggest focusing on how injustice is defined at different times and places (the nod to Plato is an example), and not simply trying to catalogue instances of injustice, which would be an endless project subject to endless debates about what is and is not just. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Injustice

Urdu 119.158.133.251 (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paywalled, circular referencing strains credibility and is pompous (not in a good way)

The link that is currently #4 under notes and references, is to an article in Wired about how great wikipedia is:

https://www.wired.com/story/want-to-know-how-to-build-a-better-democracy-ask-wikipedia/

So wikipedia is saying if you want to know more about injustice, go give WIred some money. And we can presume that the article will tell us how wikipedia is so great for justice and democracy, and how it's free, and that everybody should read it. Wikipedia has strict standards for what qualifies a valid citation. This just looks stupid. Fairthomas (talk) 02:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Wikipedia is sometimes quite problematic, but despite this so-called "Dark Side" in quotes, of Wikipedia, at least it's still useful. 177.105.94.73 (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]