Jump to content

Talk:Indian leopard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Distribution

[edit]

It would suggest, the indian subspecies is not distributed in China, I would guess there occures the indochinese leopard, but i am not shure about this.--Altaileopard 15:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this. Leo1pard (talk) 06:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Indian leopard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page views

[edit]

Leo1pard (talk) 13:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced material?

[edit]

@BhagyaMani:, why you are removing materials that Leo1pard put them about leopard size, saying that its a newspapper information? You are showing WP:BIAS. Im feeling sorry that its safer to read elsewhere out of Wikipedia. Punëtori' Rregullt 10:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

In my edit summary, I clearly referred to WP:notability and that ONE sadly overfed individual is NOT notable for entry into an encyclopedia, the more so if that content is solely based on articles written by journos. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@BhagyaMani: Then based on this, I would suggest; we can propose a deletion for Balaji (leopard) as

Because same information from Balaji was copied to Indian leopard. Agree with me? I think no!? - Punëtori' Rregullt 05:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

This page on Balaji probably doesn't meet the notability criteria either. In general, I think it's not worthwhile to create pages about individual animals. So if you propose a WP:AfD, I will likely support; just let me know. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 06:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Punetor i Rregullt5 It's no longer an article (or stub for that matter), it's been redirected to an article where it most probably fits well. Leo1pard (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Leo1pard :) - Punetor i Rregullt5 08:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]