Talk:Index of Japan-related articles

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:49, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Indexes

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles

Central talk page for all the "subpages"

I suggest this talk page be disignated the talk page for all of the "subarticles" to keep discussion in one place. Cheers · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 13:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no logic or policy-based objection or actionable counterproposal within a week, or before I get round to checking this notification again, I will redirect the talk pages accordingly. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 07:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scope, and inclusion of redirects in the index.

How is the scope limited/defined?
What are the inclusion conditions for redirects?

Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 14:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that "redirects with possibilities", which represent topics which could reasonably be separate Wikipedia pages, are suitable for inclusion, even if there are currently insufficient reliable sources or notability to start such articles, provided that the redirects link to a section which clearly and recognisably provides relevant information on the subtopic. Redirects which are minor alternative spellings might well be out of scope, Redirects which are commonly used alternative terms will usually be in scope. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 07:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Annotations

The bare links can be very uninformative. MoS recommends annoting links to help inform the reader what the target page is about, which should result in a higher percentage of useful first tries. The template {{annotated link}} uses the short desctiption of the linked page as an annotation. They are not always great, but usually much better than nothing. When they are bad it is usually an indication that the short description should be changed. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 14:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]