Talk:Index (economics)

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Where's the definition?

Like a lot of the finance entries, this stub uses a lot of words to not really say anything that makes any sense to a layperson. If the goal of an encyclopedia is to educate the un-educated, this stub does a poor job. I've left the page with no better understanding of what an "index" is than when I entered it. --74.131.55.59 (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

The stub Index number has some good sources that should be preserved but it is the same topic as this. I will perform the merge in a couple of days if there are no objections. Jminthorne (talk) 07:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jminthorne, I agree that a proposed merge will benefit both pages. Shall I merge them? It seems like there are no objections. Wikigratia (talk) 15:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, merge the pages. Add Index number as a section to Index (economics). Aditya (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done VQuakr (talk) 04:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Diewert's comment on this article

Dr. Diewert has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

I have attached my lecture notes in my Applied Economics Course (Economics 594) at the University of British Columbia and Chapters 5 and 6 would be relevant for the economic index numbers entry. However, getting these chapters into a form that would be suitable for Wikipedia would be a big job. Now there is another world expert on index number theory who has a pretty good recent book that reviews the non-economic approaches to index number theory: Price and Quantity Index Numbers, Bert M. Balk, Cambridge University Press, 2008.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Diewert has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Diewert, Erwin. (2007). The Paris OECD-IMF Workshop on Real Estate Price Indexes: Conclusions and Future Directions, Economics working papers diewert-07-01-03-08-12-12, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 31 Jan 2007.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Index (economics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090117035026/http://www.politonomist.com/gdp-deflator-and-measuring-inflation-00491/ to http://www.politonomist.com/gdp-deflator-and-measuring-inflation-00491/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]