Talk:Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album)

Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album) is the main article in the Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 6, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
July 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
August 4, 2012	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 7, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
November 1, 2012	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
December 8, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 19, 2013	Good topic removal candidate	Kept
June 16, 2024	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Guatemala Low‑importance

	Guatemala portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 17 September 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'm going to review this album to leave comments. This is not for GAN, but it should help out regardless.

Lead

References are not required in the lead as they are sourced in the body in the article.
- Done
Some information you listed in the lead are not mentioned in the body of the article such as the album reaching #1.
- Done
In general, the lead for this article does not adequately summarize the article well. I suggest you read WP:LEAD on how to write a lead section for an article.
- Done

Body article

Some key information for an album article are missing. For example, the commercial reception for album. How well did it do on the charts? How much it sell?
- That information is not available. i've made and extensive research over the internet and all i've found is already on the article. =( --Hahc21 (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've re-structured the article. Now it contains such info. Done
You mention a tour in the lead, but it should be summarize in the article as its own section.
- I'll be adding the tour section then...
- Done
The music sample isn't working for me. I can help out if you're having trouble. Also, the sample exceeds the limit to how long it may be. Only 10% of the total song length may be used, in this case, no more than 24 seconds per WP:SAMPLE and it is more than 30 seconds.
- Please help me! I knew that sample was over the limit... --Hahc21 (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style guide for more information on how an article for an album should be written. Erick (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

I withdrew the nomination. 2 reasons:

Ricardo Arjona is still promoting the album, so new information will arise.
A major structure is needed. Thanks for reviewing the article and writing what needed to be done. =)

The article has improved quite significantly with your major edits. Nice job! I will get the sample fixed as soon as possible. EDIT: I see you got the samples fixed already, good job! I really like the picture you added on the tour section. I would still recommend the article getting peer reivewed as it will point you to the right direction and the article will have a better chance of getting GA. Erick (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude! I'll be requesting the peer review immediately. I owe you one XD --Hahc21 (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is in good shape and TRM pretty much nailed everything in his peer review. The PR can be closed and it should be good to go for GA. Erick (talk) 17:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 19:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This version included an album-only video at No.15 called "Independiente" --> This version includes an album-only video entitled "Independiente"
No --> number
On Canada and Spain --> In Canada and Spain... make sure this type of thing is fixed throughout the article.
Following, the tracklist of 'Independiente': --> Not needed
iTunes Bonus Track --> iTunes Store bonus track
Consistency between (Billboard) and US Billboard in charts section.
Sample of "Fuiste Tu Ricardo Arjona" needs to be reduced per sample guidelines.

Ok. I fixed all. Cheers! —Hahc 21 20:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Translation problems

The original quotation on the Spanish page is «Dentro de la palabra "Independiente", incluso cuando suena a extrema libertad, hay una gran cantidad de compromiso y la responsabilidad de ser capaz de administrar, de la mejor manera posible, toda esa independencia.» The English for "compromiso" is "commitment", not "compromise". Please correct this (I do not edit because someone will revert automatically). It may be a good idea to check the quality of other translations on this page, since this is a pretty elementary error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.13.205.244 (talk) 03:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]