Talk:Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom: Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is under the stewardship of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom.

Merger proposal

I propose that 2014 British child abuse inquiry be merged into Butler-Sloss Inquiry. Clear duplication of content. I don't have a very strong opinion on the article title itself, at present, but clearly one should become a redirect to the other. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded Clearly an unnecessary duplication. Philip Cross (talk) 10:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold and merged it. Good to get the detail of the cross party letter, was fascinating seeing that build up on Twitter. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. The other article, before it was redirected to this one, contained links to Exaro reports -this, this and this, which you haven't copied across. I think that's right - though I'm sure Exaro does excellent investigative journalism, the view expressed in this discussion was that it's best to wait until those stories reach the usual mainstream reliable sources in the media, rather than reporting them direct. I agree. Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Name change?

Guess a name change will be required, as she's just resigned: [1]. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Old news, dear boy. Yes - we should probably rename it now to something like 2014 United Kingdom child sexual abuse panel inquiry, if we're not prepared to wait until a new chair is appointed. My first suggestion would probably do. We should use words taken from Theresa May's statement: "...an independent inquiry panel of experts in the law and child protection to consider whether public bodies – and other non-state institutions – have taken seriously their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse.... a non-statutory panel inquiry". Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to intrude on your four minutes of newshound glory there. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC) [reply]

I've been bold. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland

It is clear that this is not a United Kingdom enquiry as a Child Sex Abuse Inquiry is already underway in Northern Ireland and the Government is refusing to let that enquiry merge into this one. As a retired Judge is the Chair of the NI Enquiry perhaps he would be acceptable to the GB enquiry? Craig9599 (talk) 10:12, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I think you are correct. The official name of the Inquiry is Independent Panel Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, and it covers England and Wales only. I propose moving the article to the official title. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganisation of this page

This page is a bit of a mess - no doubt as a reflection of the haphazard arrangements to date. Hopefully we can rearrange the false starts into their own section once the panel finally gets down to work.JezGrove (talk) 23:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... but I tried to make it less of a mess in this edit - and you unbolded the new article title (minus the word Panel), which is unacceptable per WP:LEAD. Anyway, I've now clarified the introductory paragraphs, to remove some of the confusion. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626210949/https://childsexualabuseinquiry.independent.gov.uk/the-panel/ to https://childsexualabuseinquiry.independent.gov.uk/the-panel/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]