Talk:Illit/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Illit. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Requested move 10 March 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Illit (group) → ILLIT – The current situation is, the group is commonly addressed as ILLIT (all in capital letters), instead of Illit or its original spelling I'LL-IT (or alternatively I'll-it). The title should go with the name that was commonly spelt and used for addressing the group. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TMRULES and WP:TITLEFORMAT. Nor is ILLIT considered as acronyms (not that I'm aware of) to qualify under MOS:CAPSACRS and/or MOS:ACROTITLE and/or WP:NCCAPS. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: the group's name is not an acronym as far as I am aware and 아일릿 reads as Illit, therefore ILLIT is stylism. Abdotorg (talk) 17:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: MOS:TMRULES. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above reasons. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 11:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above comments. The group's name is not an acronym. Random86 (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.