Talk:Illinois Route 103/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

No disamb links and references work.

This is a nice piece of work, but I am placing it on hold so that you can address a few concerns.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
In the last sentence of Route Description, please include the year of the traffic density data.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I assume that there are no projects planned?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have placed the article on hold. Racepacket (talk)

I added the date for the traffic data, with another reference to confirm it. The Illinois Department of Transportation doesn't list any projects involving Route 103, so presumably there aren't any. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 00:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 04:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]