Talk:Illinois Route 103

Illinois Route 103 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 21, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Illinois Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Illinois
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Illinois Route 103/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

No disamb links and references work.

This is a nice piece of work, but I am placing it on hold so that you can address a few concerns.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
In the last sentence of Route Description, please include the year of the traffic density data.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I assume that there are no projects planned?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have placed the article on hold. Racepacket (talk)

I added the date for the traffic data, with another reference to confirm it. The Illinois Department of Transportation doesn't list any projects involving Route 103, so presumably there aren't any. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 00:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 04:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]