Talk:Ileodictyon cibarium

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ileodictyon

Looks like this article needs to be renamed to the above spelling. I'm not sure how to do that. Any takers? Sasata (talk) 03:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

It is not clear wether the sheath of the unhatched basket is edible, or the actual basket inside the unhatched sheath is edible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.127.52 (talk) 07:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I'm aware, the whole thing (sheath and unhatched basket) is edible, but I'll see if I can find a reference. Beastiepaws (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

The first paragraph states that the species is found in Australia, NZ, Tanzania and South Africa, with a reference for Australia only. Landcare Research lists Australia, NZ and Chile as its native distribution (cited in the Distribution section). GBIF shows some records from Europe and S Africa. What is the definitive distribution of this species, and what reference should be used (GBIF, Landcare, other?)Stitchbird2 (talk)Stitchbird2

I tend to attempt to find a scholarly article or book to reference regarding distribution. I don't have an issue using Landcare as they are obviously a reputable institution but they are definitely New Zealand focused. I try to avoid citing GBIF as they are an aggregator and although can be useful errors exist in their data. Saying that I do use GBIF as a last resort if I can't find any other sources of info on distribution. - Ambrosia10 (talk)