Jump to content

Talk:Ikara (missile)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Off-target

[edit]

Ikara had double the range of ASROC, ASROC's flight time was 55s max, & the Mk44's max detection range 457m. How does this bear on the ability of Ikara to hit, exactly? It's very unclear. And the diagram showing ASROC PK is no help... TREKphiler hit me ♠ 19:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ASROC PK

Double the range of ASROC?

[edit]

The article says that Ikara has a range of 10 nm and is double that of ASROC. But the ASROC article says that it has a range of 15 nm. What's the story here?--Dwane E Anderson (talk) 14:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ikara (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Ikara (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hawker Siddeley Ikara?

[edit]

Can anyone comment on why Commons has this categorised as Hawker Siddeley Ikara? Trawling throught the convoluted history of 1960s British aerospace mergers is always tricky, but did Hawker Siddeley really have that significant an involvement to appear in the naming like this? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: There is an Ikara missile on display in the RAF Museum Cosford. Its surrounding explanatory material describes it as the “Hawker Siddeley Ikara, Ship-launched anti-submarine missile”. There is no mention of Ikara’s Australian origins. At Government Aircraft Factories#Products (an Australian entity) the Ikara is claimed as one of GAF’s products.
The likely explanation is that, by the end of the RN’s association with Ikara, Hawker Siddeley was the interfacing entity between the Australian supplier and the UK Ministry of Defence. It is also likely that Hawker Siddeley and/or its predecessor was responsible for installing and maintaining the ship-board system in RN ships equipped with Ikara. Dolphin (t) 10:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My comment was spurred by visiting Cosford and uploading some photos of its Ikara to Commons.
I wouldn't trust the information boards at Cosford though. Some of them are just a bit of 1980s anti-peacenik sarcasm, but many have really quite glaring howlers on them. Their caption of the "Hawker Siddeley"(sic) Firestreak emphasises the need for it to obtain a "radar lock" before launch. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A heat-seeking missile that requires a radar lock! Now that’s a hybrid. Dolphin (t) 11:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ikara_(missile)&oldid=1202910514"