Talk:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2023
Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2023 was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 7, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Broadness
[edit]Hi @CeolAnGhra: I'm a little concerned about the broadness of this article since you nominated it for GA. Two other recent years for Iceland (Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2020, Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021) are already GAs and have much much more information. Specifically in the "Promotion" and "At Eurovision" sections. I'd suggest you take a look at those examples and expand this as necessary to complete the full review of their participation this year. Grk1011 (talk) 11:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind review! Is there any way to retract the nomination so that I can further expand and add necessary details to the page? Thank you! CeolAnGhra (talk) 23:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for understanding @CeolAnGhra:. I believe the protocol would be for me to quick-fail the nom. It can always be renominated in the future. Grk1011 (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2023/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grk1011 (talk · contribs) 13:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I am procedurally failing this per the discussion on the page's talk page. The article is lacking coverage of several aspects of the contest prep compared to similar articles. After a quick review, some sections also lack references to reliable sources. Grk1011 (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Could use some images. Check Commons.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- See comments above and on talk page. Grk1011 (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: