Talk:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010

Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 21, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Iceland Low‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 18:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 13:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 13:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lead & Infobox

Add comma after "with the song "Je ne sais quoi""

Everything else is good with the lead and infobox.

Background

Refs #1, #2, and #3 checked – all are reliable and have appropriate information about the sentences they're cited for. No MOS issues in this section either.

Before Eurovision

Remove "100%", it's redundant
I'm not sure if this would be correct to say: "..and had the right to collaborate with foreign songwriters.." based on this sentence from the source: Those not meeting the mentioned requirements and wishing to enter the selection process can do so by working in collaboration with an Icelandic national. I suggesting splitting that into another sentence and changing it to something like (change to fit your own words): "Non-Icelandic songwriters could also participate in the competition if they joined with an Icelandic singer."
"RÚV presented the songs on 4, 11 and 18 January 2010 via radio on Rás 2." Source doesn't support this. Maybe you meant "9, 16 and 23 January"?

Question: I forgot where this came from and couldn't find anything when I searched again, so I've removed the sentence. Grk1011 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ref #20 doesn't support the sentence it's cited for (Nothing about volcanos or awareness to Iceland; this is included in Ref #24 however)

Question: Ref 20 has the interview recording link in it and this is discussed during it. Grk1011 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, didn't see that. All good then. — Golden ^{call me maybe?}

At Eurovision

[[Bookmaker|bookmakers]] -> [[bookmaker]]s

Refs #25 to #46 checked. No further issues with the sources or the MOS in this section.

Conclusion

No issues with plagiarism (checked with Earwig's copyvio detector). Two of the three images in the article are free, while "File:Söngvakeppni Sjónvarpsins 2010.jpg" is non-free but can be used in this article per WP:FUR. No major issues with MOS and sourcing. Ready to pass once the above issues are addressed. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 15:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Golden: Thanks for the review! Everything has been addressed, except for the two comments above. Grk1011 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grk1011: Thanks for the quick fixes. Happy to pass. Congratulations! — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 18:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.