Talk:Ibn Arabi and theoretical mysticism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles

Philosophy: Religion / Medieval Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion
	Medieval philosophy

This redirect has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Proposed merger with Ibn Arabi since focus content overlaps significantly

And, the phrase "thweortecial mysticism' lascks wp:notability FatalSubjectivities (talk) 07:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree As mentioned at the lead of the article: "...refers to a school of theoretical mystical thought which was developed and explored by Ibn Arabi. This thought movement also could be considered as the continuation of Islamic philosophy." Accordingly, this school can be considered as one of the various schools of Islamic thought, such as: Ash'arism, Maturidism, Rifa'iyya, Qadiriyya, Naqshbandiya, etc. Maybe the title should be changed to "Islamic theoretical mysticism" or simply "Theoretical mysticism"?--TheEagle107 (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there are two separate discussions; I'll copy the above view over, and suggest continuing at Talk:Ibn Arabi. Klbrain (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]