Talk:I Was Born to Love You (song)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Music Video
[edit]Could we get something in here about the video here please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bansidh (talk • contribs) 17:41, 25 August 2007
I also came to this page looking for info about the video. A book I have, "Queen" (Mick St. Michael 1995), says that is it not known who the woman in the video is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.208.60 (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
maybe double infoboxes?
[edit]The infobox looks a bit confuzing, with both freddie and queen in the same one. the songs are somewhat different, so maybe two templates could be appropriate. for instance it says producer is Queen, but the freddie version had him and Mack as producers... Also it says date recorded is May 1984-1995. it seems as it was recorded for 10 years :) I'll edit it now... Donny 17:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I think it should be mentionned that Queen's "re-recording" used the old solo recording of Freddie's voice. The article implies that it was an entirely new recording, but I think it's sort of a remix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.208.60 (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:IWBTLY.jpg
[edit]Image:IWBTLY.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Cover version
[edit]I just stumbled upon a cover version by Worlds Apart (boyband) from 1996.
Should this article perhaps contain a section about cover versions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.212.216.91 (talk) 10:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I Was Born to Love You (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090423055233/http://music.goo.ne.jp/cd/CDDORID270723-1/index.html to http://music.goo.ne.jp/cd/CDDORID270723-1/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)