Talk:I Wanna Have Your Babies

I Wanna Have Your Babies has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 22, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
February 14, 2010	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutral point of view?

I have removed this section from the article because it violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. This section states that Beidngfield is one of the United Kingdom's "most prized singing talents" and that the song is a "great precursor to an album rumoured to be 'up there' with Joni Mitchell's Blue and Julia Fordham's Porcelain in terms of its emotional resonance and musical accomplishment."

These statements can be re-added to the article when they can be backed up by articles, interviews or reviews from reliable sources.

“

...presents a pathologically dark side of a relationship that the singer is at pains to conceal from the unwitting would-be father. This deeply psychological twist on the standard "let's be together" ballad is as uplifting as it is disturbing, playing with shades of dark and light, of relational obsession and unfulfilled (and unfulfillable) love. As well as striking a feminist tone, it marks a chilling return to form for one of the UK's most prized singing talents, and reveals a songwriting maturity that was only hinted at on previous releases. On this, her fifth single, Natasha overtakes older brother Daniel in writing songs of depth and meaning, and it is a great precursor to an album rumoured to be 'up there' with Joni Mitchell's Blue and Julia Fordham's Porcelain in terms of its emotional resonance and musical accomplishment.

”

-- Underneath-it-All 17:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA promotion

Really great job everybody. This is an ideal article on a single.

This sentence gave me pause because it may go out of date (or sound dated) very quickly:

So far, the song has spent five weeks in the top seventy-five of the singles chart.

Try to stay away from statements like that. Otherwise, keep up the good work.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 20:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USA Chart position?

How high did it get in America? That should be included as this moves to FA status. Judgesurreal777 22:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The song was never released in the U.S. -- Underneath-it-All 22:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's hope for the sake of Americans that it never is. We've got enough crap to deal with. --71.249.135.242 (talk) 19:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't even officially released in the US. I had to go download NB. I just got Pocketful since it's mostly new tracks.Sposato (talk) 16:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. The lack of references in the second paragraph of "Music video" is a point of concern, but not enough so to delist. Lampman (talk) 16:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Status

This has had a tag asking for references for the "Formats and track listings" for nearly two years now. These should be available. Could someone dig them up or the GA status of this article could be in jeopardy. AIRcorn (talk) 01:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Have Your Babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902102424/http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1U50 to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1U50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Have Your Babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926221600/http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/song/12475 to http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/song/12475

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]