Talk:I Hope You Find It/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bonnietylersave (talk · contribs) 13:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I will take on the review of this article. This is my first ever GA review, though I have had two articles listed as a Good Article last year (Believe in Me (Bonnie Tyler song) and Rocks and Honey), as well as two more articles currently nominated (Wings (Bonnie Tyler album) and If You Were a Woman (And I Was a Man)). I will be back soon to perform the review after a reading.

Other reviewers are welcome to help contribute.

I wish you the best of luck with this! Bonnietylersave 14:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Lead

• I think it would be a good idea to include more about Cher's cover of the song in the article lead. There is a quote from a music critic, though to read more about Cher's version I would have to scroll down to the relevant section. A short overview of Cher's version, including its success, would be a nice addition to the lead.
• Is there a single artwork for Miley Cyrus's version? If so, it would be ideal for that to be added to the infobox.

It is a song, not a single. Though, I found this fan-art online.--219.90.107.83 (talk) 14:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh sorry never mind then, I think I misunderstood. In that case, the infobox can be left how it is. Bonnietylersave (talk) 16:00, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Critical Reception

• Are there any more reviews that could be added? This section seems slightly short, though will do if there are no more reviews to add.

Live performances and promotion

• It would be ideal to add reference links for Cher's live appearances on TV. Are there some reviews of her live performances (on TV) of the song? That might also be a nice touch to the article.

Track listings

• An iTunes link to the single as a reference beside the Digital single bullet point would be suitable since the CD single is also referenced.

References

• The references used in this article are inconsistent in date format. You can choose out of three formats: "2014-08-07", "7 August 2014" or "August 7, 2014".
• Some citations are desperately in need of re-formatting. References 7 and 8 need turning to, for example, ""
• Other references that need revisiting include 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 29, 30, 31.
• The "gaon chart" needs re-linking as it appears to be dead. You may need to find another website that links to this, or remove the reference an information if it just isn't accessible anymore.

References example

First of all, thank you so much for agreeing to review this. Secondly, I've fixed all the references you pointed out. What else has to be added? CyrockingSmiler (talk) 09:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

You are most welcome. I have just neatened up two more references and will give the article another read soon. Nothing major jumps out at me as an issue. Bonnietylersave (talk) 14:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

In my opinion, this article is adequate for GA classification. Well done! Bonnietylersave (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)