Jump to content

Talk:IV Corps (United Kingdom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal

[edit]
I separated this article from IV Corps (India) to distinguish the formations of the British Indian Army from the post-independence Indian Army. In part this was because editors were deleting the names of World War II commanders and adding those of officers who currently command the corps. The article on the post-independence IV Corps could certainly do with some editing and improvement, but I do not have the sources to do this. I would strongly oppose a re-merger of the articles. HLGallon (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with any merger is that these are two different corps. The British WWI and WW2 corps. Then the Indian corps post 1947. As it stands this the British Corps article with a question mark is the Indian corps notable ? If we remove the British Corps detail (as we should being two different armies) there is not much left --Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I quite agree - the British and Indian IV Corps are separate entities. If every 'British' formation that ever included Indian, Australian, Canadian etc troops was treated as if it were the same as an Indian, Australian or Canadian formation with the same number, chaos would ensue. There are already enough inconsistencies between the British WWI/WWII corps entries, which I have begun trying to straighten out.Rickfive (talk) 11:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IV Corps (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IV Corps (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]