Talk:ISRO/GA3

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Ppt91 ^talk 01:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ppt91 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Thanks for your work on this article. Unfortunately, this is a quick fail due to the article being a long way from meeting several GA criteria WP:GAFAIL. The article requires extensive cleanup (no article with a maintenance tag should be nominated), the lead is too long to comfortably navigate, content of the article needs to be reorganized to conform to WP:MOS, and referencing style should be improved for consistency and reliability, among other issues. This is the third nomination of this article and I do not believe that it should be re-nominated again until major edits are performed. Moreover, the current nominator has only contributed around 20% of the article content, which is not enough to address the issues raised in this and previous reviews. Ppt91 ^talk 01:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.