This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:37, December 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (This video game developer made products to 3 main consoles plataforms and for an arcade board, wich have relevance since those types of plataforms are proprietary and it´s game collections are notable. Specialy for the genesis, wich have Captain America and The Avengers. I confess that I still didn´t participate in any discussions on english wikipedia´s policies and guidelines about video game related articles notability, but, in my vision any publisher and/or developer company that made at least 1 game for a proprietary plataform (console, portable, arcade) is sufficiently eligible for have an article since it´s products are part of a notable game library (i.e. the correspondent platform game library). To antecipate an counter argument herem I know that notability isn´t inheritable, but still I say: It´s products are officialy part of great games collections licensed by platforms owner and easily found. (i.e. it´s differnet, for example, for indie games distributed inside or outside of distribution platfomrs wich exists in thousands)) Ogat (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
