Talk:iPad Pro (6th generation)

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating the article!.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tags

Hi @SMBMovieFan:. You had an issue with me removing some of the tags from this page? Specifically {{Cleanup rewrite|date=October 2022}}, {{Verifiability|date=October 2022}}, {{Full citations needed|date=October 2022}}? I can explain my logic per WP:BRD:
Cleanup rewrite: how? why? whoever added these tags doesn't explain anywhere that I can see. The article is short and imperfect, but the layout and structure doesn't seem particularly problematic. I'm used to seeing this tag on articles which are far more obviously not structured or written like a wikipedia article.
Verifiability: Not 100% sure what this tag implies, but seems to suggest that the claims can't be proven. Really? Again, which? How? If this is not specified, how can any editor address this supposed issue?
Full citations needed: I'm really not sure which citations this refers to, but they all seem to be averagely complete compared to other articles? Maybe again worth explaining somehow, somewhere, what the particular issue is?
One other small request: When reverting other people's edits, please include some kind of explanation. Could preclude the need for talk page discussions like this. Cheers! Jdcooper (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup rewrite: This article could easily be explained better so thats why i put the tags there.

Verifiability. the Features part of the article needs to be verified. For example: "The 11-inch model has a Liquid Retina display with a peak brightness at 600 nits, which is the same as the 11-inch model of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th generations" but that does not have a verifiable citation. SMBMovieFan (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet. Nythar (💬-🎃) 23:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup rewrite is for articles that are complete nonsense/not written in the proper structure of a wikipedia article. as for the second part, that's covered by the other sourcing tags, or just put {{cn}} by the claims that aren't sourced. Jdcooper (talk) 23:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]