Jump to content

Talk:INS Sindhurakshak (S63)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The name is correctly translated in this article but the same name has been transaalted incorrectly for all the kilo class submaries, with sindhu being interpretted as 'sea' in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindhughosh_%28Kilo%29_Class

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why the past tense in the very first sentence?

[edit]

The submarine has sunk, but it's still intact and in commission. So it still "is" a submarine, not "was". 138.130.153.1 (talk) 08:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cause those stupids didn't know how to write an article properly. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shah-E-Zaman (talk • contribs) 12:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to the talkpage. Just so you know, though, if you see something obviously wrong like that in Wikipedia, it's OK to just change it. Formerip (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to the explosion section

[edit]

A faulty battery is believed to have triggered the initial (smaller) explosion and fire which then reached the torpedo room located directly above the battery storage space.[1][2] However, Adm. D. K. Joshi, India’s naval chief disagrees stating that the batteries were probably not at fault.[3] Mohan Guruswamy, a military analyst with the Observer Research Foundation, stated that some naval officers believe that the explosion was caused by human error after "munitions were mishandled" as the submarine was being prepared for deployment.[4]

A Kilo-class submarine can carry up to 12 torpedoes in the torpedo room with an additional six in the torpedo tubes.[5] Two types of torpedoes are used on Indian Kilo-class submarines, including the Type 53-65 anti-ship torpedo and the TEST-71 anti-submarine torpedo.[6][7] The nuclear-powered submarine Kursk was lost with all hands in August 2000 after it suffered two explosions in the torpedo room, caused by a defective hydrogen peroxide Type 65-76 "Kit" (Whale) torpedo.[8] Some versions of the Type 53-65 torpedo also use hydrogen peroxide,[9] however it is unknown whether the Indian Navy uses them.

  1. ^ http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/blast-sinks-ins-sindhurakshak-experts-blame-battery-fire-ammunition-explosion-113081500054_1.html
  2. ^ http://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsins-sindhurakshak-sinks-killing-onboard-sailors
  3. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/15/world/asia/explosion-partly-sinks-indian-naval-submarine.html
  4. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/17/world/asia/india-submarine.html?_r=0
  5. ^ http://www.alrosa.net/eng/arms/
  6. ^ http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/blast-sinks-ins-sindhurakshak-experts-blame-battery-fire-ammunition-explosion-113081500054_1.html
  7. ^ http://weaponsystems.net/weapon.php?weapon=HH14%20-%20Type%2053
  8. ^ http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WTRussian_post-WWII.htm
  9. ^ http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WTRussian_post-WWII.htm

I have moved these addition to the article here, so that we can discuss them. The first para is nothing but contradictory speculation about the accident. There is no use of that here, specially as the navy's official report on the accident will be available on completion of their accident enquiry. I do not see how the second paragraph is relevant under the explosion section (WP:OR), and i have doubt about the reliability of the sources. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 14:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of name?

[edit]

What does Sindhurakshak mean? --208.185.21.102 (talk) 01:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sanskrit, meaning "protector of the seas". see here. I will add this to the article. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 01:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kilo877/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sindhurakshak to be sunk again.

[edit]

This article says the Sindhurakshak will be sunk again and be used for scuba training exercises. I do not care to add it now. Better to do so after it has been done or at least when a date is set. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on INS Sindhurakshak (S63). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on INS Sindhurakshak (S63). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:INS_Sindhurakshak_(S63)&oldid=1257910343"