Jump to content

Talk:IG-11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleIG-11 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starIG-11 is part of the Characters from The Mandalorian series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2020Good article nomineeListed
September 26, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 3, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that IG-11, from the Star Wars series The Mandalorian, so closely resembles the character IG-88 that fans and journalists initially confused the two?
Current status: Good article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk07:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self-nominated at 16:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article long enough at 15,360 characters (2,540 words) "readable prose size". Article new enough, created December 1, 2019 as a redirect and became a non-redirect on January 17, 2020, Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 12 edits ago on January 17, 2020. Article is neutral and cites sources with inline citations. Earwig shows article is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism, with hits being mainly cited quotes. Hooks short enough, main hook is 156 and alt1 is 146 characters. Hooks are interesting to a broad audience and are neutral and do not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people. Hook facts are accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article. The QPQ was done.
I think alt1 is much more interesting. I made the same mistake. The main hook sounds too subjective to me. --Nessie (📥) 05:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:IG-11/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

That's all I have. FWIW I thoroughly enjoyed the article, the above are suggestions which would probably propel it way beyond GA quality. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 11:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]