Talk:ICE Cubes Service
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
My review
[edit]I will perform a review on your draft, which by no means will be complete nor thorough, and will require of additional editing by other contributors. Although the company is a commercial entity, the introduction is overly promotional rather than descriptive. I will try to "Wikify" that and some other entries, but please consider it just as a start of the procedure, not approval.
Some points that need addressing:
- While references by ESA are useful and bring undeniable legitimacy, I would like to see references from the mass media to further support WP:Notability.
- The modules are not spacecraft but seem to be miniature labs restricted to the interior of the ISS, so it is not "true outer space exposure". I think that "Space science" is a better descriptor than "Aerospace" company.
Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @FKE94: Hello. Is there a standard hardware, volume, or size for the cubes? I think the article needs to better describe the basic unit (cube) and how it facilitates the modularity and their incorporation to the "plug-ins" onboard the ISS. Is the modularity concept analogous to CubeSats? (see section below). A reference supporting such info will be need. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
CubeSat
[edit]The pictures make the cubes look like CubeSats, though clearly they don't have the same ability to live outdoors, independently. Should the similarities and differences be discussed? Jim.henderson (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)