Talk:I.O.N (manga)

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Name

Why is the article named I-O-N, when Viz released it as I.O.N? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poking about googlespace, I can see no reason why not to move the article to the official English title I.O.N, with redirects from common mispunctuations such as I.O.N. and I-O-N and I·O·N (that last being the Japanese version). —Quasirandom (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reviews

I know someone had mentioned that they couldn't find any reviews, but I found two. I'm pretty sure the ANN one would be fine for inclusion, but I'm not sure about the other one.

As far as I can tell, Comic Book Bin is a reliable source -- the seem to do at least some fact-checking on their news reports, but I don't know of a specific ruling/investigation about it from either WT:RS or WP:COMICS. Since the site's focus is American comics, possibly someone over in WT:COMICS would be able to comment on their reputation. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, Comic Book Bin has been used as a reference in 23 articles, including Shonen Jump (magazine). —Quasirandom (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]