Talk:Hurricane Fox

Hurricane Fox has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Fox is part of the 1952 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 25, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
February 16, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

On 29 October 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hurricane Fox (1952) to Hurricane Fox. The result of the discussion was moved.

Added rainfall graphic

Luckily, information concerning this system was available from NCDC for the Greater Antilles. Thegreatdr (talk) 02:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool! I was wondering how there was data for Cuba. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Fox (1952). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved per the discussion below. (non-admin closure) Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Fox (1952) → Hurricane Fox – Clearly the most notable of the 3 Fox storms, It's stronger, way deadlier, and way costlier than any other Fox storms, and also meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. SomeoneWiki04 (talk) 10:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Per nom. Stareiglace (talk) 07:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support The fact that it has been redirected there since 2008 is also very telling. Noah, BSBA^Talk 12:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.