Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Fay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Hurricane Fay (2014))
Featured articleHurricane Fay is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 10, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 21, 2015Good article nomineeListed
November 28, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 4, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hurricane Fay caused about 3.8 million USD in damage in 2014?
Current status: Featured article

Remnant or Extratropical low of Fay???

[edit]

I still remembered by looking at satellite imagery that after Fay had dissipated, its circulation was still active until late on October 15, as it was absorbed by a developing low. Do we put extratropical or remnant low for this, or maybe even just leaving it alone. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd leave it alone for now, wait for the TCR to come out. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 00:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sure. Thanks. Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Fay (2014)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 17:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  • Great job with the lede! It might be perhaps a bit jargony, but nothing too bad IMO. The only thing I would add is that when you mention Gonzalo, you should say "which struck the island X days later."
  • "A small vorticity" - I know what it means, but since it is the beginning of the MH, why not just a "small circulation"?
  • Link upper-level low
  • "extended to north and west of the low" - either add "the" after "to", or get rid of "to"
  • "By early on October 12, the system was upgraded to a Category 1 hurricane." - that kinda comes out of nowhere. You spend several sentences saying that conditions weren't favorable. You should say right here why it was upgraded (I'm guessing Recon obs?)
  • "The storm attained its peak intensity with maximum sustained winds of 80 mph (130 km/h)" - you already said it had an 80 mph peak. Why mention it twice? And what was the basis for the peak intensity? Land obs or recon?

Otherwise, the article is a great read. Good work to everyone involved! I'll be happy to pass when these issues are addressed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A-Class?

[edit]

Well, I've spent much of today tying up loose ends with this article, updating the impact section with some recent sources and better integrating the TCR into the met. history. I think the writing and research are FA quality, but it's just a bit too short to be worth an FAC, so... A-Class? – Juliancolton | Talk 00:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I checked it out, and it certainly passes our A-class criteria. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 October 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (page mover non-admin)  Paine  u/c 15:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hurricane Fay (2014)Hurricane Fay – It was the only storm with the name to become a hurricane N-C16 (talk) 08:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.