Jump to content

Talk:Huntly Power Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit note

[edit]

The paragraph on the load factor of Huntly had two clauses which made it look a bit silly. They were:

  • "about twice what the best wind farms could achieve in New Zealand" - this is like comparing apples and oranges; different power technologies have different characteristics. Embedded in the clause is the implication that wind power cannot substitute for thermal generation. That is certainly a common argument from defenders of coal-fired thermal power stations but this par is not the place the have the argument;
  • "in other words, it is rarely running substantially below peak capacity" - well, that is normal simply because of the characteristics of different generating units - ie maintenance downtime, load demand etc. there is no need for this extra clause given that the 85% figure is already cited.--Bob Burton (talk) 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think its a valid statement, it's in the refs or I wouldn't have put it in there, and it's far from comparing apples with oranges - this is about comparing fruit with fruit, which you can certainly do! However, I somewhat agree with you that it is not needed to be discussed at that specific place, so I won't revert your changes. Ingolfson (talk) 10:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above edits read like a policy debate, which means they're original research, and therefore not allowed in Wikipedia. The NZ Herald citation doesn't even make these statements. --Lholden (talk) 10:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Huntly Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The archived page looks ok to me. --Pakaraki (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Huntly Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Huntly Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Load Factor

[edit]

"Load factor of 85% or more" isn't understandable to a layperson (and the wikipedia entry for load factor isn't much help). After a bit of searching I believe this means that Huntly runs on average at 85% of its peak capability - which is a good thing compared to, say, a wind farm that will have a lower load factor (since its generation depends on wind strength). Can an expert clarify in the article? Mrgilbe1 (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those terms can be a bit confusing. Load factor is the average percent output when the plant is running. Net capacity factor (NCF) is more useful. This is the average output over the whole time period (ie including times not running for maintenance, breakdown, standby, etc). It appears that Brian Fallow might have confused those two parameters in that article cited.--Pakaraki (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Huntly_Power_Station&oldid=1202094903"