Talk:Hunk-O-Mania
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Infobox Update
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please remove Jeffrey Wachman (Director of Business Development) from the infobox since he is no longer with the company.
Thank you,
Naadobea1776 (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Reply 03-JUL-2019
[edit]Edit request implemented Spintendo 19:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Naadobea1776 (talk) 21:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Add citations
[edit]Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [See below] |
add to introduction:
The company operates in 19 cities in the United States.[1]
add citation after Magic Mike in See Also, which explains the connection to the movie:
Thank you,
Naadobea1776 (talk) 17:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "A Male Strip Club for Women Worth Millions: Q&A With Hunk-O-Mania's Founder Armand Peri". Observer. 2019-03-19. Retrieved 2019-07-04.
- ^ Rockett, Darcel. "The male strippers of Hunk-O-Mania Chicago talk myths, money and 'Magic Mike'". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved 2019-07-04.
Reply 04-JUL-2019
[edit]Edit request partially implemented
- The claim regarding operations was added to the lead section.
- Links in the See also section are placed depending on editorial judgement. Whether or not references are placed along with the links is not addressed, although guidance suggests that links where the connection is not apparent should be annotated.[1] I don't see any prohibition against including a reference within the annotation itself, however, if the connection is not adequately explained by the annotation alone, and must include a reference in order for the connection to become apparent, then the use of that reference inside the annotation of a WikiLink may be seen as being similar to an WP:EASTEREGG, because it requires the reader to access the link in the Chicago Tribune reference in order to understand the connection mentioned in the annotation.[2] A better use would be to simply place the link to the Chicago Tribune article mentioning Magic Mike in the External links section.
- Additional changes made:
- The Chicago Tribune article mentioned above was placed in an External links section.
- Regards, Spintendo 23:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "MOS:SEEALSO". Wikipedia. 10 May 2019.
Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous.
- ^ "Link Transparency". Wikipedia. 19 June 2019.
Do not use piped links to create "Easter egg" links that require the reader to open them before understanding what's going on. Wikipedia is not an Advent calendar.
Categories:
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class nudity articles
- Low-importance nudity articles
- WikiProject Nudity articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Implemented requested edits
- Partially implemented requested edits