Talk:Humberside Police/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Hullian111 (talk · contribs) 14:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 01:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I am going to quick fail this nomination. My reasons are listed below:
- The lead needs to be expanded so that it covers all major aspects of the article. If a section has a level 2 heading (like "History", "Operations", etc.) then it should be summarised in the lead.
- There is a lot of uncited text, including entire paragraphs with statistics. There should be a citation at the end of every paragraph, minimum.
- The lists of "Chief constables", "Officers killed in the line of duty" and "Notable incidents and investigations" are probably not needed in this article. If this information is notable, they should have their own list articles. Instead, this information should be mentioned in the article if it is notable for police force. In otherwords, if the incident caused widespread changes, a major scandal, or continuous news coverage, and the changes in police chief can be incorporated into the prose of the History section.
- Some sections are too long: I recommend that each section be 3-5 paragraphs. Use level 3 headings or summarise the information to make the text more readable.
- Similar to the above, I would remove the level 3 headings in "Documentaries" as this is MOS:OVERSECTION and can just be presented as paragraphs.
Please feel free to post on my talk page if you have any questions or concerns about this review. I will run the bot to fail this GAN momentarily. Z1720 (talk) 01:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.