Talk:Human rights in Africa

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Janiarhodes.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is basically an opinion piece

This article is basically an opinion piece, the "point of view" of the author(s) is plainly discernible, it contains little to no concrete facts, it should have NO place on wikipedia, and the NPOV tag must not be removed until it complies with WP:NPOV (q.v.). Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to see you revise this article to address your concerns, but without some ongoing work, I've removed this template per #3 in the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since no one has objected to your statement above, I assume you have a free hand to revise. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be more Comprehensive

I suggest that we edit this page to be more comprehensive and include issues such as children's rights and health rights. Patience456 (talk) 18:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]