Talk:Hulme Hippodrome

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hulme Hippodrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130609165400/http://www.bm2c.co.uk/clients/gdm_web/pastor.html to http://www.bm2c.co.uk/clients/gdm_web/pastor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is incredibly bloated

Not to sound rude or dismissive to whoever has put this much work into the article, but the amount of detail is so overwhelming that I would not be surprised if it stopped people reading anything. It put me off. I didn't know where to start. So I read the synopsis at the start and then left the page.

To put my point in context, the word count for the "Hulme Hippodrome" wikipedia page is around 25,000 words. The word count for the wikipedia page for "Manchester" is 18,000.

I copied the article into Microsoft Word to get a word count and it filled almost 100 pages... the sheer amount of information will have the opposite effect intended: people won't read it, and they won't learn about the building (which is the point of the article I imagine?).

Consider a much briefer article, with links to further reading if desired. 2A02:C7C:C03:E00:F928:3F2E:6BAD:4790 (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]