Talk:Hugh Foliot

Hugh Foliot has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 24, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 24, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hugh Foliot took custody of Hereford Castle in 1223 as part of Hubert de Burgh's takeover of power from Peter des Roches?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 7, 2019, August 7, 2023, and August 7, 2024.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Hugh Foliot is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Herefordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[hospital#Medieval Europe|hospital]] The anchor (#Medieval Europe) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hugh Foliot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: hamiltonstone (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC) The article is neutral, stable, well-referenced and contains no images. I have undertaken some minor copyediting. Specific comments:[reply]

What is a "papal judge-delegate" - any chance of a link to something that will explain what this means to a lay person?
- Here you go: papal judge-delegate Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I love the way you write whole articles to fix an issue like this. We're very lucky to have you on the project. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why no link for King John?
- linked Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What is a "benefice"?
- linked Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I assume there was a change in King between 1216 and 1219, because different Kings (John and Henry III) are mentioned; but if that assumption is wrong, then an explanation is needed.
- You are correct. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The first para of "Bishop" section is either out of order, lacking in clarity, or perhaps a bit of both. The second sentence seems to be explaining the circumstances that led up to the event in the first sentence. Should it not therefore come first? In addition, not knowing what a "cathedral chapter" is, makes understanding the overall events a little hard. But that may be unavoidable.
- Linked cathedral chapter, added "from Hereford" and reorderd. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"and since Foliot accompanied him, the statement by a medieval chronicler from Dunstable that their destination was not certain, being either Rome or Compostela, should be discounted." I get the point, but the non-equivalence in the way sources are presented in the article text makes this odd. Why not first tell us who says that Roche travelled to Spain; who says Foliot accompanied him; who says this is unclear (ie. the mediaeval chronicler); and why the last should be discounted?
- clarified a bit. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
consistency query: there is "Roches" in second para, and "des Roches" in the third. Is there a reason?
- fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise excellent. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that takes care of it... Ealdgyth - Talk 14:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A pleasure, as always. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]