Talk:Hugh (disambiguation)

On 4 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hugh to Hugh (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was moved.

Edits to page on Mar 15 2008

Page was flagged for clean-up and was way too long
Created Hugh (given name) and moved infobox, the "Origins" introductory paragraph, the "given name" categories and all entries pertaining to people with the first name "Hugh" to that page.
Added "see also" links to Hughes, Hugo and Hugues
Have started to connect the various European noble titles with one another. I had hoped to catogorise them under Cypriot, French, Frankish, Anglo-Norman, English, etc... but over the course of history many of these titles overlapped various territories and with one society conquering another they all sort of blended together. I kept them as separate as I could.
I have removed the "in use" tag in order to allow others a go at it (I've been at this for half a day), but I do plan on coming back to this page and better narrow the list for people two whom one or more of the titles belong. The list also needs to be standardized (ie. date of birth, AKAs etc...) Marchije (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

Please add its Pronunciation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.22.101.27 (talk) 09:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 June 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh → Hugh (disambiguation)
Hugh (given name) → Hugh

– The given name is the primary topic. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the given name has 10,123 views, the Northern Territory one has 36, the robot has 18 and the hill has 5[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:DPT, https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Hugh shows 232 outgoing clickstreams towards the proposed primary topic over 749 views, which is actually just ~31%, but at the same time no other topic comes up, and a quick skim of the sum of the long-term significance of the remaining items doesn't seem to be comparable. Looking at the reader interest, all time views of all Hugh biographies and all time views of all Hugh topics, the difference is staggering, multiple orders of magnitude. This looks like another case of an WP:NAMELIST obscuring actual reader interest. This seems easy to support then, but at the same time, the most popular topics are still sorted in that list in a manner that requires a lot of scrolling and searching. Resolving this RM will be much easier than resolving the matter of effectively navigating readers. --Joy (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and per the succinct rationale of Necrothesp. The primary topic of a term overwhelmingly used as a given name should be the given name. BD2412 T 17:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.