Talk:Hue–Da Nang Campaign
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Hue-Da Nang Campaign)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hue–Da Nang Campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Hue–Da Nang Campaign has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Question
[edit]Silly question about the lead - was the war still known locally as the "American War" even by 1975? Shimgray | talk | 16:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hue-Da Nang Campaign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- I formatted one citation (ref#1); assume good faith for all off-line sources.
- I removed the EL, as per WP:EL, as it is already used as ref#1
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Sufficeinet detail and focus.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Suitable captions and rationales for non-free use.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- An excellent article. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you very much for assessing the article.Canpark (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Southeast Asian military history articles
- Southeast Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Vietnam articles
- High-importance Vietnam articles
- All WikiProject Vietnam pages