Jump to content

Talk:Hue–Da Nang Campaign/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Well written and organized. I made a number of minor copy-edits.[2]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I formatted one citation (ref#1); assume good faith for all off-line sources.
    I removed the EL, as per WP:EL, as it is already used as ref#1
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Sufficeinet detail and focus.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Suitable captions and rationales for non-free use.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    An excellent article. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]